Marchex Call Analytics Launches Keyword-Level Tracking; Enables Marketers to Capture Calls Tied to Search Terms

No Comments

Marchex Call Analytics Launches Keyword-Level Tracking; Enables Marketers to Capture Calls Tied to Search Terms: “

 

SEATTLE – Marchex Inc., (NASDAQ:MCHX) announced the introduction of keyword-level tracking to its Call Analytics product. Marchex’s proprietary technology enables search marketers and agencies to accurately track calls down to a specific keyword without using a unique call tracking line for every search term. The benefits to search marketers include: – eliminating search terms that [...]“

 

(Via AdOperationsOnline.com.)

Google Can Index “Almost Any Text” In A Flash (SWF) File

No Comments

Google Can Index “Almost Any Text” In A Flash (SWF) File: “The Google Webmaster Central Blog posted an update on their Flash indexing capabilities. Google said, as of today, they are able to index and understand ‘almost any text a user can see as they interact with a SWF file on your site.’ Typically, Flash has been one of those big No-Nos in…

Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article.


 

(Via Search Engine Land: News About Search Engines & Search Marketing.)

BlueKai and Efficient Frontier Partner to Extend Keyword-Based Targeting Beyond Search Engines

No Comments

BlueKai and Efficient Frontier Partner to Extend Keyword-Based Targeting Beyond Search Engines: “


Beta keyword targeting capability offered through BlueKai Intent™, the largest aggregation of in-market shoppers and keyword searchers on the Internet SEATTLE – BlueKai, the world’s largest data auction marketplace for all audience data and online marketing’s largest source of user intent data, announced a partnership with Efficient Frontier, a leading global performance marketing company with [...]“

 

(Via AdOperationsOnline.com.)

Hot At Sphinn: SEO’s Bad Reputation, Google ‘Pollutes’ The Web & More

No Comments

Hot At Sphinn: SEO’s Bad Reputation, Google ‘Pollutes’ The Web & More: “A news article about Google from The Guardian was popular last week on Sphinn, as was last week’s member discussion about the SEO industry’s ongoing reputation management problems. The Guardian article, Google is Polluting the Internet, says that ‘the danger of allowing an advertising company to control the index of human knowledge is too obvious [...]

(Via Search Engine Land: News About Search Engines & Search Marketing.)

ClickyTouch brings Google Analytics alternative to iPhone

No Comments

ClickyTouch brings Google Analytics alternative to iPhone:

ClickyTouch brings Google Analytics alternative to iPhone Clicky is a Website stats tracking alternative to Google Analytics. Now, thanks to a third-party developer, you can take your Clicky stats on-the-go with your iPhone or iPod touch.

(Via Macworld.)

Facebook Gives Google The Middle Finger

No Comments

Facebook Gives Google The Middle Finger: “

Last week Google changed their Contacts API terms of service to block Facebook from importing a user’s emails. Rather than obeying the terms, Facebook has come up with a hack around Google’s existing system, as first published by Techcrunch.

While Facebook doesn’t explicitly support Google contact imports (Google is not one of the services listed on their ‘Find Your Friends’ page, you can enter your gmail address under ‘Other Email Service’ and you will be sent to the following page:

Download Google Contacts

This is a page that Google previously created to enable users to download all their data for their own use. Facebook has essentially hot-linked directly to the download page and then prompts users to upload the contacts. While this will probably result in a huge decrease in the number of GMail contact imports, it’s much more of a statement by Facebook which essentially suggests they’ll work around any system Google creates. Additionally, they’ll welcome any user to lock in their data within Facebook!

It’s a statement by Facebook against data portabilityand in support of developing creative workarounds to digest large amounts of user data. Whether or not Google will block this workaround we aren’t sure, although it would definitely be expected if Google is going to set a precedent over their new data portability terms.

(Via All Facebook.)

Google Now Lets You Preview Search Results Before You Click Them

No Comments

Google Now Lets You Preview Search Results Before You Click Them: “

 

Google, in its insatiable quest to create a speedier and more useful user experience, is launching a new ‘instant’ feature to help users choose between search results.

 

Google Instant Previews, which begins its rollout today, essentially gives users the ability to see a website before they visit it. Google accomplishes this by taking a screenshot of every webpage in its index and giving users access to it via a magnifying glass icon that sits to the right of every search result.

When a user clicks or hovers over the magnifying glass, a screenshot of the webpage in question will appear on the right side of the search results page. It’s an at-a-glance view of the website’s content without actually having to visit the webpage.

The key element to Instant Previews though is that Google highlights the section of the page where the search term occurs. Imagine you’re trying to find information on a specific person on a page that lists dozens or hundreds of people. Instead of having to scroll through the entire page to find the person, you can just look at the Instant Preview and see where they are on the page.

‘This is the next evolution of finding a result on a search engine results page,’ distinguished engineer Ben Gomes told me yesterday.

Gomes says that there are a few specific use cases where Instant Previews are especially useful. One example he offered is when you’re looking for specific charts, graphs or pictures, Instant Previews will show you where the search term occurs and you’ll quickly see whether the graph is appropriate to your search or not. Another is people search; by using Instant Preview, a user can quickly scan the page and find out if the page is about the person they’re looking for.


Speeding Up the Search Process or Weighing It Down?


 

 

 

 

Gomes explained Instant Previews to me as a natural progression for ‘the evolution of speed.’ Google has an obsession with making search faster, and he cited Autocomplete and Google Instant as examples.

Instant Previews doesn’t focus on speeding up the actual searching of terms though, but rather the decision-making process of choosing a result. Google currently provides a lot of ‘snippet’ data to help. At one time search engines just displayed the first two lines from a webpage under a search result, but now they include information like sitelinks, date, cached content, jump to links and even Google Places. Instant Previews now takes that snippet and puts it in context with the rest of the page.

Is the new feature going to really speed up the user’s search experience, or is it yet another complicated layer on what was once a simple and easy-to-understand search interface? That’s up to users to decide, but Google’s internal testing shows that people using Instant Previews are 5% more likely to be satisfied with the search results they click. While 5% may not sound like much, for a search engine with Google’s scale, that could make all the difference against its chief rival Bing, which has turned to Facebook to make searches more relevant.


 

(Via Mashable!.)

Google’s “Related Searches” Now Include Brands, Types, and Stores in Results

No Comments

Google’s “Related Searches” Now Include Brands, Types, and Stores in Results: “

Over the past few months Google has been testing out 3 new categories in ‘related searches’: brands, stores, and types. Search Engine Roundtable tried out the new feature using the terms ‘diamonds’ and ‘cameras’, while I performed queries using the key words ‘laptops’ and ‘smartphones’. Both searches displayed the new ‘related searches’ refinements and gave me a list of popular brands, types and places where I could purchase the items.


I can definitely see the upside of these refinements; Googlers can now hone in on exactly what they are looking for when it comes to search for popular products. This new enhancement is another example of how Google is trying to make the search experience faster and more user-friendly and it definitely is a continued step in the right direction.

Do you find the new ‘related searches’ categories helpful?

Check out the SEO Tools guide at Search Engine Journal.

Google’s ‘Related Searches’ Now Include Brands, Types, and Stores in Results


 

(Via Search Engine Journal.)

Leaked Google Documents Reveal How Much Big Brands Spend on Search Ads

No Comments

Leaked Google Documents Reveal How Much Big Brands Spend on Search Ads:



Ad Age has obtained an internal Google document that highlights some of the biggest AdWords buyers for the month of June 2010, offering insight into how big brands are using Google and how much they are spending. According to the documents, the biggest buyers of AdWords in June included AT&T Mobility, Amazon, eBay and BP. Although most of those companies are frequent big GoogleGoogleGoogle spenders, BP was a newcomer to the list, spending $3.59 million on search ads in the wake of the gulf oil spill (compared to just $57,000 in the two months prior).


Top Spenders


The top spender in June, AT&T Mobility, spent $8.08 million on search ads to coincide with the release of the iPhone 4. According to Ad Age, AT&T’s the third-largest U.S. advertiser overall, so its Google spending is not a big surprise.Other companies that made up the top 10 include:

  • Apollo Group – You know them as The University of Phoenix and they spent $6.67 million in June 2010
  • Expedia – $5.95 million
  • Amazon – $5.85 million
  • eBay – $4.25 million
  • Hotels.com – $3.30 million
  • JC Penney – $2.46 million — we’ll admit, this one surprises us
  • Living Social – $2.29 million
  • ADT Security – $2.19 million

Why Brands Buy Google Ads


The data shows us that for big brands, a heavy investment in Google is usually tied to revenue that comes directly from search traffic (as in the case of Amazon, eBay, Expedia, Hotels.com) or in instances where companies are trying to build awareness (AT&T) or weather a PR crisis (BP).It’s also interesting to note some of the brands that aren’t on the list. The documents obtained by Ad Age indicate that companies like GM, Disney and BMW spent less than $500,000 on Google ads in June. Even Apple spent just less than $1 million on Google ads, despite its high-profile launch of the iPhone 4.However, we also think it is possible that some big brands are spending money on search, but not directly with Google. For instance, although Ad Age cites Walt Disney as one of the companies that spent less than $500,000 on Google ads in June, the movie studio released Toy Story 3 that month, a film supported by a massive ad campaign. The film has gone on to gross more than $1 billion worldwide, making it one of the most successful animated films of all-time. It seems odd that Disney would spend only $500,000 on search terms for its big summer release.What seems more likely, however, is that Disney purchased advertising through companies like Fandango or MovieTickets.com and those companies have their own arrangements with Google. In other words, when it comes to evaluating search spending, don’t count out the potential middle men.This also makes sense when taking a big-picture approach to Google’s own revenue. The top 10 brands only accounted for 5% of U.S. revenues for the month.Google is a big target for advertisers because of its strength in search and because of its ubiquity across devices. We do wonder if ad buys will shift to other outlets, like say, FacebookFacebookFacebook, as users spend more and more time on those networks.


(Via Mashable | The Social Media Guide » Business Feed.)

FTC Catches Rock Band Game’s PR Agency Faking Reviews

No Comments

FTC Catches Rock Band Game’s PR Agency Faking Reviews:

The PR outfit that publicizes the Rock Band video game franchise settled with the Federal Trade Commission, which caught agency employees posing as customers to post positive reviews on the iTunes App store.

Reverb Communications agreed to remove the reviews in question and not post any reviews in the future without revealing the writers’ connection to the product.

The FTC intervention falls in line with the commission’s efforts to crack down on non-disclosed online paid endorsements of products.

How much do reviews matter to you when you’re trolling for apps?

 

(Via Consumerist.)

Older Entries